A man who alleges that a poorly executed penis enlargement procedure left him with a diminished manhood is pursuing legal action against his doctor.
Ilter Turkmen, a wealthy banker from Tekirdag, Turkey, sought the services of Dr. Haluk Soylemez to enhance his 4.7-inch penis.聽
In legal documents, Turkmen asserts that Dr. Soylemez assured him of a minimum increase of 1.1 inches in length and 1.1 inches in girth, according to local media.
But reports suggest that the procedure performed in January 2022 resulted in disaster, leaving Turkmen with a smaller - and scarred - member.
Instead of the anticipated increase of up to two inches, Turkmen claims that the operation reduced his manhood to a mere 4.3 inches.
Photo shows an illustrative image of Tekirdag, undated. Tekirdag is a city in Turkey, located on the north coast of the Sea of Marmara
The enraged banker is now seeking 500,000 lira - roughly 拢13,000 - in compensation.聽
Doctors performed a second procedure to address the bleeding and limit the damage following the attempt at extending Turkmen's manhood.
But Turkmen claims he still endured excruciating pain as a result of the alleged botched surgery, hindering his ability to walk for a month.聽
In his legal filing, Turkmen contends that the bungled operation not only caused severe pain but also disfigured his already diminished penis with noticeable scars.
Dr. Soylemez however refuted Turkmen's claims, asserting in court: 'There is no fault in the procedure I performed.'聽
His defence team argues that, due to the patient's anatomical structure, there was a risk of the operation resulting in no elongation, or less elongation than average.
Dr. Soylemez also denies making any specific commitments to the patient regarding length or girth, and challenged claims that the size of Turkmen's penis decreased following the surgery.聽
The defence contends that Turkmen's demand for compensation is excessive, characterising it as an attempt at unjust enrichment.
The filing states: 'The plaintiff received a big bill from another doctor. Demanding this fee as material compensation for his treatment is groundless, aimed at unjust enrichment, and unacceptable.'
The case is ongoing.
Turkey |
[复制链接]
匿名
发表于 2024-8-2 00:42:42
/1 
